[00:00:05]2007年黑暗版历年阅读真题解析第二篇 [00:00:25]沪江考研 [00:00:45]by:daisy8475 [00:02.26]For the past several years, [00:03.92]the Sunday newspaper supplement Parade has featured a column called “Ask Marilyn.” [00:09.89]People are invited to query Marilyn vos Savant, [00:13.85]who at age 10 had tested at a mental level of someone about 23 years old; [00:19.68]that gave her an IQ of 228 — the highest score ever recorded. [00:25.67]IQ tests ask you to complete verbal and visual analogies, [00:30.61]to envision paper after it has been folded and cut, [00:34.34]and to deduce numerical sequences, among other similar tasks. [00:38.89]So it is a bit confusing when vos Savant fields such queries [00:43.37]from the average Joe (whose IQ is 100) as. [00:46.81]What’s the difference between love and fondness? [00:50.11]Or what is the nature of luck and coincidence? [00:53.69]It’s not obvious how the capacity to visualize objects [00:58.25]and to figure out numerical patterns suits one to answer questions [01:02.29]that have eluded some of the best poets and philosophers. [01:06.56]Clearly, intelligence encompasses more than a score on a test. [01:11.03]Just what does it mean to be smart? [01:13.87]How much of intelligence can be specified, [01:16.33]and how much can we learn about it from neurology, [01:19.53]genetics, computer science and other fields? [01:23.20]The defining term of intelligence in humans still seems to be the IQ score, [01:28.22]even though IQ tests are not given as often as they used to be. [01:32.28]The test comes primarily in two forms: [01:36.40]the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and the Wechsler Intelligence Scales [01:41.31] (both come in adult and children’s version). [01:44.92]Generally costing several hundred dollars, [01:47.87]they are usually given only by psychologists, [01:50.89]although variations of them populate bookstores and the World Wide Web. [01:55.38]Superhigh scores like vos Savant’s are no longer possible, [01:59.49]because scoring is now based on a statistical population distribution among age peers, [02:05.18]rather than simply dividing the mental age by the chronological age and multiplying by 100. [02:11.10]Other standardized tests, [02:14.03]such as the Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) and the Graduate Record Exam (GRE), [02:20.38]capture the main aspects of IQ tests. [02:23.61]Such standardized tests may not assess all the important elements necessary to succeed [02:28.99] in school and in life, [02:30.42]argues Robert J. Sternberg. [02:32.29]In his article “How Intelligent Is Intelligence Testing?”, [02:36.02]Sternberg notes that traditional tests best assess analytical and verbal skills but fail [02:42.47]to measure creativity and practical knowledge, [02:45.36]components also critical to problem solving and life success. [02:49.69]Moreover, IQ tests do not necessarily predict so well once populations [02:55.82]or situations change. [02:57.64]Research has found that IQ predicted leadership skills when the tests [03:02.39]were given under low-stress conditions, [03:04.87]but under high-stress conditions, [03:06.67]IQ was negatively correlated with leadership—that is, [03:11.41]it predicted the opposite. [03:13.88]Anyone who has toiled through SAT will testify that test-taking skill also matters, [03:19.42]whether it’s knowing when to guess or what questions to skip.